THANKSGIVING AND THE AMERICAN CONSCIENCE: A THREE PART REFLECTION-PART III

Intertwined Destinies: A Shared, Fractured, And Enduring Legacy

If the first two parts of this essay trace the movement of history—the rise, the rupture, the unravelling—this final part turns toward the deeper question: What did this encounter ultimately do to the social, economic, and moral intercourse between those who were native to the land and those who arrived to remake it? What remains after the battles, the treaties, the migrations? What threads of culture, ethics, law, and imagination were woven—sometimes harmoniously, sometimes violently—into the American tapestry?

To read early America correctly is not to imagine two worlds sealed off from each other. It is to see a profound and continuous entanglement. The frontier was not a line; it was a porous zone of exchange. The newcomers did not merely impose; they absorbed, learned, borrowed. Indigenous societies did not simply lose; they reshaped the landscape of the new world, left linguistic echoes, agricultural foundations, political insights, and spiritual sensibilities that remain embedded in the American character.

This final section explores that legacy—not as a sentimental reconciliation, but as a clear-eyed look at how two civilizations shaped one another, sometimes beautifully, sometimes tragically, always irrevocably.

I. The Everyday Exchanges That Built a Continent

Long before textbooks codified “American culture,” it was being shaped, quietly and invisibly, in the daily interactions between settlers and Native peoples.

Agriculture


The modern American diet—from corn to beans to squash, from maple syrup to wild rice—is profoundly Indigenous. Settlers survived their earliest winters because Native communities taught them the agricultural rhythms of the land. When the Pilgrims gathered for what would later be mythologized as the “First Thanksgiving,” the food on the table—turkey, corn, pumpkins—was entirely native to the continent.

Ecology & Land Stewardship

Controlled burning, forest management, and rotational land use—practices refined over millennia—were adopted by European settlers and later incorporated into American forestry. Ecologists now recognize that the “wilderness” Europeans admired was in many places a human-crafted ecosystem.

Language


From Massachusetts to Chicago, from Appalachia to Kansas, Indigenous names shape the American map. Even everyday vocabulary— “hickory,” “pecan,” “moose,” “chipmunk”—reveals linguistic adoption.

Political Influence

The Iroquois Confederacy’s sophisticated political system, with its federal structure and emphasis on balance between states (nations), is widely seen by scholars as influencing American republican thought. Benjamin Franklin admired it deeply, noting:

“It would be a strange thing if six nations of ignorant savages should be capable of forming a union… and yet a like union should be impossible for ten or a dozen English colonies.”

Despite the derogatory phrasing, the admiration was real.

These exchanges did not erase conflict; they coexisted with it. But they remind us that the American story is built on reciprocity as much as rivalry.

II. The Social Psyche: Fear, Fascination, and the Birth of an American Archetype

The frontier created powerful emotions—fear of attack, fear of wilderness, fear of the unknown. But it also generated fascination: admiration for Indigenous resilience, curiosity about their spiritual worldview, envy of their freedom and relationship to nature.

From the earliest captivity narratives to the later literature of Cooper and Thoreau, Native figures appear simultaneously as threat, guide, noble exemplar, and tragic victim. These contradictory archetypes shaped the American imagination.

The “Noble Savage” and its Shadow

European thinkers like Rousseau romanticized the “natural man,” often using Indigenous Americans as symbols of purity uncorrupted by civilization. The concept was misguided, but it influenced early American notions of virtue, simplicity, and moral clarity.

The Warrior and the Outlaw

On the frontier, the Indigenous warrior became a figure through which settlers projected both fear and admiration. American folklore often elevated this figure even as policy undermined the very people it idealized.

Spiritual Influence
Indigenous cosmologies—rooted in cycles, seasons, reciprocity, and sacred land—quietly influenced American transcendentalism. Thoreau’s meditations, while not direct borrowings, resonate with themes long central to Native worldviews.

A nineteenth-century Algonquin elder is said to have remarked:

“The land is our mother. The rivers are our blood. If we sell you the land, must we also sell you the air?”

This poetic moral logic would echo—sometimes consciously, often unconsciously—in American environmental thought.

III. Economics, Trade, and the Shifting Balance of Dependency

For much of the early encounter, the economic relationship was mutually dependent. Settlers required Indigenous foodways, knowledge of terrain, and access to the fur trade. Native nations, in turn, incorporated European goods—iron tools, guns, cloth—into their societies.

But as colonial populations grew, this balance shifted.

The Fur Trade


What began as a partnership turned into competition and then depletion. Overhunting, driven by European demand, disrupted ecosystems and intensified inter-tribal conflict. The economic trap became clear: reliance on European goods increased even as the resources needed to obtain them dwindled.

Land as Commodity

For European settlers, land was capital. For Indigenous societies, land was life. This fundamental mismatch accelerated every negotiation and every misunderstanding.

Labour and Frontier Economies

In some regions, Indigenous labour, craftsmanship, and guidance were indispensable. In others, violence replaced cooperation, particularly as plantation economies expanded in the South.

By the eighteenth century, economic dependence had become asymmetrical—and this imbalance shaped the political destiny of the continent.

IV. The Moral Ledger: Justice, Memory, and the Long Aftermath

To speak honestly about legacy is to acknowledge a moral dimension that remains unresolved. The encounter produced extraordinary cultural synthesis, but it also produced deep wounds: removal, dispossession, broken treaties, cultural erasure, and demographic collapse.

Broken Treaties


The United States government would eventually sign hundreds of treaties with Indigenous nations—and break a vast majority of them. Each broken agreement became part of a cumulative moral burden that the nation still grapples with.

Removal and Trauma

The story that began on the Atlantic coast culminated, by the nineteenth century, in forced removals like the “Trail of Tears.” The logic of expansion, once justified as religious mission or economic necessity, hardened into a national policy.

Yet survival endures.
 Despite immense loss, Indigenous nations—Cherokee, Mohawk, Wampanoag, Lenape, Lumbee, Seminole, and many others—continue to thrive, preserve language, rebuild institutions, and assert sovereignty. Their presence is not merely historical; it is contemporary, political, and cultural.

A Cherokee writer captured this resilience:

“We are the people who stayed. We are the people who remain.”

This, too, is America.

V. A Shared Future Rooted in an Entangled Past

What does it mean, finally, to speak of legacy? It means understanding that the American story is not complete without Indigenous foundations. It means acknowledging that settlement was both creation and destruction. It means recognizing that the relationship between Natives and settlers produced not just conflict but culture—holidays, foods, place names, ideals of freedom, ecological wisdom, and political structures.

It means, above all, accepting that the destiny of the continent was shaped not by one civilization replacing another, but by two civilizations locked in a long, painful, generative encounter—one whose echoes continue in debates about land, justice, identity, and belonging.

The frontier is gone. But its shadow—and its light-and its pains—remain.

Published by udaykumarvarma9834

Uday Kumar Varma, a Harvard-educated civil servant and former Secretary to Government of India, with over forty years of public service at the highest levels of government, has extensive knowledge, experience and expertise in the fields of media and entertainment, corporate affairs, administrative law and industrial and labour reform. He has served on the Central Administrative Tribunal and also briefly as Secretary General of ASSOCHAM.

Leave a comment