Bengaluru—once serenely known as India’s Garden City—is today hailed as the IT Capital of India, a pulsating nerve centre of the digital economy, flush with start-ups, unicorns, venture capital, and dreams coded in binary. But beneath this luminous façade lies a more sobering reality: a city caught in a slow but visible unravelling. One must now ask—not out of cynicism, but out of civic concern—is Bengaluru decaying?
Growth Vs. Gridlock
The transformation of Bengaluru has been as rapid as it has been uneven. From a modest 6.5 million in 2001, the population has surged to more than 13.5 million by 2021, with projections pointing to 15 million by 2025. Yet infrastructure, that skeletal system of any modern city, has failed to keep pace. Roads remain choked, stormwater drains collapse with every monsoon, and public amenities struggle to serve a swelling, impatient population. The BBMP’s own inspections uncovered hundreds of potholes in critical zones like Whitefield, while stretches in Palace Guttahalli have languished for months without repair. Grand plans exist—tunnels, corridors, smart infrastructure—but they remain mostly in theory, not practice. A city that once prided itself on grace now stumbles over its own negligence.
The Deficit of Morality
But the city’s deepest affliction may not be infrastructural—it is moral. Corruption, once whispered about, is now accepted as the default cost of participation. Karnataka ranks third nationally in corruption cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, with over 1,700 pending trials. Citizen report cards continue to reflect poor service delivery and growing cynicism. When the exception becomes the norm, outrage fades—and in its place, resignation takes root.
A City Without A Role Model
Equally troubling is the eclipse of civic role models. Bengaluru once looked up to towering figures like Sir M. Visvesvaraya and Nobel laureate C.V. Raman—men who embodied excellence, integrity, and public spirit. Today, ask the average student who their icons are, and the answers are vague at best. A city that forgets its giants becomes vulnerable to mediocrity. Without visible models of ethical leadership, the youth are left adrift in a world where influence is confused with wisdom, and visibility mistaken for virtue. This silent erosion of aspiration is as dangerous as any infrastructural collapse.
Emerging Parochialism
Bengaluru is also witnessing a subtler form of decay: the erosion of community and cosmopolitanism. A city built on the strength of diversity—drawing scientists from Tamil Nadu, artists from Bengal, engineers from Kerala, entrepreneurs from Gujarat—is now increasingly fractured by parochial anxieties. Language chauvinism, regional insecurity, and political opportunism are beginning to corrode the very idea of a shared civic identity. For a city that once embodied openness, this inward turn is not just regressive—it is self-defeating. Great cities thrive by attracting talent, not excluding it.
Outsourced Living
Meanwhile, the everyday life of the city tells its own story. A widely shared meme sums up Bengaluru’s new lifestyle with bitter irony: “Zomato and Swiggy don’t want you to cook. Ola and Uber don’t want you to walk. Zepto and Blinkit don’t want you to leave home.” What began as convenience has hardened into dependency. Meals, mobility, groceries—even human contact—are outsourced. The gig economy may power the city, but it leaves behind invisible trails of fatigue, lethargy, and a troubling erosion of personal agency.
An Unprecedented Challenge
Public health mirrors this decay. Air quality routinely breaches safety norms. Water scarcity is deepening. Mental health distress is spiralling. A 2022 NIMHANS study found over 10% of adults in the city suffer from psychiatric disorders, while calls to helplines have spiked 28-fold in just three years. These are not isolated indicators—they are symptoms of a city in emotional exhaustion.
Culturally, too, the soul of Bengaluru is in retreat. The city of sabhas, bookstores, and slow conversations is now overtaken by malls, microbreweries, and weekend binging. The arts survive, but struggle for space. Reflection has been replaced by performance. The pursuit of depth has given way to the cult of immediacy.
Even governance mirrors this civic hollowness. When a tragic stampede claimed 11 young lives at a function felicitating players of a local Cricket team, no one accepted responsibility. Blame was passed, headlines faded, and silence prevailed. Infrastructure continues to be confused with development; large budgets and cosmetic projects substitute for basic dignity—like clean streets, drinkable water, walkable pavements. Industrial revival zones like Peenya are proposed, but their success depends on whether they serve communities or contractors.
The Road Ahead: Conscience Vs. Concrete
And yet, all is not lost.
Beneath the sprawling dysfunction, sparks of resilience persist. Citizens continue to fight for lakes, for trees, for honest governance. Footpath activism, urban farming, community libraries, art collectives—they all bear witness to a city refusing to forget its better self. The will to change, though fragmented, is alive.
But such islands of hope cannot remain archipelagos. They must cohere into a larger movement—one that recognises that a city is not just a collection of roads and rooftops. A great city, like a great civilisation, is ultimately a reflection of its character—how it treats its weakest, how it balances prosperity with equity, and how it preserves its memory while embracing modernity.
Bengaluru’s battle, therefore, is not just against poor planning or corrupt deals. It is a struggle to recover its soul—to evolve a civic identity that honours its past, engages its present, and aspires to a more inclusive, thoughtful future.
This city can still be saved. But it will require more than blueprints and budgets. It will require conscience. It will require character. And above all, it will require a collective refusal to accept decay as destiny.
Bengaluru’s crisis is not just about potholes and pollution—it is about character. A city of this scale and significance must recover a sense of moral purpose. It must choose conscience over convenience, and character over charisma.
It must rediscover what it means to live together with grace, to govern with responsibility, and to grow with inclusivity.
Because in the end, a city is not remembered for how fast it grew—but for what it stood for.
scribo ad LX 