III. Overview of Current Health Infrastructure
India’s healthcare infrastructure, while significantly expanded in recent decades, continues to face challenges of inequitable distribution and quality. The healthcare system is structured across primary, secondary, and tertiary levels, yet many components remain under-resourced and unevenly developed, particularly in rural areas. A comprehensive analysis of the current system reveals critical gaps that must be addressed to meet the healthcare demands of an aspiring world power by 2047.
Primary Health Centres (PHCs), serving as the first point of contact for rural healthcare, number 24,855 nationwide. These centres are designed to cater to populations ranging between 20,000 and 30,000. However, they frequently lack essential infrastructure and staff. Many PHCs operate without a full complement of medical officers, nurses, and diagnostic equipment, undermining their efficacy. In contrast, developed nations like the United Kingdom ensure robust primary healthcare networks, emphasizing universal access and consistent quality across locations.
Community Health Centres (CHCs) form the secondary tier of healthcare delivery in India, with 5,335 centres established to serve populations between 80,000 and 120,000. Despite their intended role in providing specialized care, CHCs often fall short of the required staffing norms, particularly in critical specialties such as surgery and obstetrics. These shortages highlight systemic inefficiencies that compromise patient outcomes. The United States, by comparison, addresses similar challenges through Federally Qualified Health Centres (FQHCs), which receive adequate funding and maintain staffing levels to ensure comprehensive care in underserved areas.
At the tertiary level, district hospitals serve as the backbone of advanced medical care, with over 800 such facilities across India. Uttar Pradesh leads with the highest number of district hospitals, reflecting its large population. However, these hospitals face significant challenges, including overcrowding, resource limitations, and delays in service delivery. Developed countries maintain better patient-to-doctor ratios and provide advanced diagnostic and treatment capabilities at regional hospitals, ensuring timely and effective care.
Medical education and training infrastructure have seen considerable growth in India, with 612 medical colleges offering nearly 92,127 MBBS seats and producing approximately 27,000 doctors annually. Despite these achievements, the geographic distribution of medical colleges remains skewed, with only 11% located in rural areas. This imbalance perpetuates the urban-rural divide in healthcare access and expertise. In countries like Germany, dual training models effectively combine academic learning with practical experience, ensuring a steady supply of qualified healthcare professionals across regions.
India’s healthcare delivery is overwhelmingly dominated by the private sector, which accounts for approximately 70% of services, predominantly in urban areas. This dominance has resulted in high out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), with nearly 63% of healthcare costs borne directly by individuals. This financial burden contrasts sharply with public health systems in countries like Canada and the United Kingdom, where government-funded schemes ensure equitable access to healthcare without imposing direct financial barriers on patients.
The integration of traditional medicine systems, including Ayurveda, Unani, and Naturopathy, represents a unique aspect of India’s healthcare framework. While efforts under the AYUSH ministry have brought greater visibility to these practices, their systematic integration with allopathic medicine remains limited. China’s model of blending Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with modern practices provides valuable insights for India to develop a more holistic healthcare system.
IV. The Burden of Health Care Demand
A deeper analysis of supply and demand dynamics underscores the magnitude of India’s healthcare challenges. On the supply side, India’s doctor-to-population ratio stands at 1:854, surpassing the WHO-recommended 1:1,000. However, this achievement masks the uneven distribution of healthcare professionals, with 60% concentrated in urban areas. Shortages of paramedics, nurses, and midwives further exacerbate the strain on the system. India’s ratio of 2.1 nurses per 1,000 people pales in comparison to the OECD average of 8.8, indicating significant room for improvement.
From a demand perspective, the dual burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) places immense pressure on the healthcare system. While diseases like tuberculosis continue to affect vulnerable populations, the rising prevalence of NCDs such as diabetes and hypertension underscores the need for preventive care. India’s increasing life expectancy, currently at 70.3 years, also demands a greater focus on geriatric healthcare services. However, healthcare-seeking behavior is often hindered by factors such as poverty, illiteracy, and lack of awareness, particularly in rural areas.
India’s healthcare expenditure, at 2.1% of GDP in 2023, is significantly lower than the over 10% spent by developed nations such as the United States and Germany. Increased public investment in healthcare is essential to reduce OOPE and improve access. Additionally, developed countries’ use of technology, such as telemedicine, offers scalable solutions for bridging the urban-rural divide—a strategy that India has begun to adopt but needs to expand significantly.
Achieving equitable healthcare access by 2047 will require targeted interventions to address these systemic challenges. A holistic approach encompassing increased investment, workforce development, and the integration of technology and traditional medicine is essential. Drawing lessons from developed nations while tailoring solutions to India’s unique context will be key to building a resilient and inclusive healthcare system capable of meeting the needs of a growing and aging population.
The economic burden on families is significant, with out-of-pocket expenditures accounting for a large share of health spending. Expanding healthcare infrastructure alone will not suffice to address this challenge. Instead, reducing the demand for healthcare services through preventive measures must become a national priority.
(To Be Continued…..)
scribo ad LX 